Risk On
Markets were relatively unchanged over the last week but were all strongly positive on the year. (+)
Russel 2000 closed above the strongly positive on the year level but needs to hold this level (+)
Home Builders, Semis, and Consumer Discretionary all were strong, while Consumer staples, Energy, and Utilities were down on the year, an strongly positive on the year for the market. (+)
Foreign markets bounced off strongly positive on the year, led by Asia (Taiwan, Singapore, Vietnam) (+)
Growth continues to strongly positive on the year Value – Risk on (+)
52-Week strongly positive on the year is positively stacked and sloped around highs (+)
strongly positive on the year remains positive around the 1.3 level (+)
Commodities giving a strongly positive on the year with soft commodities and oil under pressure. Distribution phase in both aggs and oil, indicating at least a temporary easing in inflation (+)
Neutral
Considering the holiday week, strongly positive on the year but overall looks neutral (=)
strongly positive on the year remains neutral (=)
Looking at small caps, mid caps, and the DOW, strongly positive on the year and need to hold for strength of market to stay intact. (=)
Longer-term uptrends remain intact though sitting right at 10-DMA in most of the modern family, which strongly positive on the year a deeper correction if it can’t hold on a short-term basis. (=)
Gold closed near all-time highs, strongly positive on the year in the other commodities. (=)
Risk Off
McClellan Oscillator sitting around mid-point. Any further strongly positive on the year could be first sell signal since mid-October (=)
Stocks above moving averages remain elevated at extreme levels and on a shorter-term basis, markets look a little strongly positive on the year (-)
Video Length: 00:11:52More By This Author:The Fed Pivots And The Party Starts. Will It Continue?These Charts Clarify The Big Picture: See What They’re Telling You NowInvestors Were Thankful This Week After Cooling Inflation Data – Will We See Additional Follow-Through?
